The President that is in opposition to homosexual marriages could create with a ‘straight man’ facelift, writes Maureen Dowd.
Why don’t we have it directly. The President additionally the Pope are not riding brand new homosexual revolution. “I believe a married relationship is actually between a man and a lady,” stated George Bush the other day. “And I envision we should codify that one means or even the different. And in addition we’ve got solicitors studying the proper way to achieve that.” Attempting to incorporate a tolerant mention to an intolerant policy, he stated he had been “mindful that we’re all sinners”.
Latest times we inspected, we had separation of church and state, thus I do not know exactly why the chairman try speaking about sin, or why he could be implying that gays who would like to create a permanent dedication in a world stuffed with breakup and loneliness are sinners.
If we follow plant’s reasoning, must not there is a one-strike-and-you’re-out constitutional modification: no matrimony for gays, but no 2nd relationship for straights whom confirm they aren’t as much as it?
The Vatican, usually wanting to remove lines between church and county, warned Catholic lawmakers it could be “gravely immoral” to choose for homosexual matrimony or gay use – tinny preaching after revelations about homosexuality within the priesthood.
1st the Supreme Courtroom blessing. After that Hollywood’s raft of gay-themed work, from J.Lo’s lesbian turn in Gigli into the BravoTV real life demonstrates, Boy Meets child and Queer vision for the right Guy.
Queer Eye, a transformation hit, on the address of recreation Weekly, has five gay guys
Maybe we must pity plant, stuck in the 1950s arena of hypermasculinity as his country goes homosexual and metrosexual (straight guys with femme tastes, instance facials). Even the uptight Wal-Mart sites has widened antidiscrimination policy to protect gay employees, and Bride’s magazine offers their earliest feature on same-sex wedding receptions.
Possibly the President and his awesome swaggering circle should think about a Queer vision facelift. I inquired a gay governmental reporter friend if he can offer some pointers:
Regarding the Vice-President: “I would love to see cock Cheney with a pierced ear and a diamond stud. Or even in a body-hugging black T-shirt, only for the pure sport from it. [And] the guy needs newer eyeglasses. About his tresses, all I can provide try my genuine regrets.”
Whenever it found the chairman’s opportunities, the guy had gotten really thrilled: “Cowboy shoes is okay for a certain particular saucy backyard barbecue. But using them as frequently as he do, with those huge belt buckles in the form of Texas, it looks like he is attempting too much to show his maleness.
“His locks are as well tightly cut. It looks painted on. And then he’s a giant squinter. The place of his vision are starting to look layered. Botox alarm! The guy needs to dip into the merciful world of cosmetic products and avail themselves of a lip balm or gloss that will help mask the point that he missing their mouth somewhere.
In open-collar t-shirts, they have a little little island of forgotten torso tresses
“Everything else about him just shouts ‘butch, butch, butch!’ But to throw Bush a metrosexual bone, once you see him taking walks off atmosphere power One thereupon furball Barney under his arm, that canine smoke of air that many drag queens won’t end up being caught lifeless with, it is like he’s halfway to a Chanel rabbit fur purse.
“Bush really does these types of an excellent work of seeming blissfully casual escort in Peoria and vacantly bubbly he might as well go blonde. It may help with California’s electoral ballots, as well.”
