For the Fig
Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends
Mathematical studies
General linear designs was utilized for linear regression analysis (Pearson’s R relationship) to evaluate brand new relationship out of urinary Na + and you may K + excretion which have SBP. For Figs. 2 and you may step three, two-way ANOVA that have Tukey’s article hoc try did evaluate SBP among the many organizations outlined on such basis as urinary Na + and you may K + excretion. So you can assess the effectiveness of broadening urinary Na + and K + excretion in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Size is determined. From inside the Figs. 4 and you may 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen relationship was did to evaluate the new organization of one’s urinary Na + :K + removal ratio which have SBP. 6 study had been examined of the a great about three-ways ANOVA therefore the pairwise evaluations were made playing with Tukey’s article hoc attempt. eight cousin frequency delivery try assessed using good Gaussian complement studies. 05 (GraphPad prism software, adaptation 8). Investigation was shown just like the suggest ± SD.
Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.
Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1.99 g/day, values shown as mean ± SD. b Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range urinary potassium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.001 and salt resistant = 0.008), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.
Baseline SBP according to urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium removal ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) relationship out of baseline SBP (built variable) along side entire set of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate changeable), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting salt sensitive = 0.0004 and you will sodium unwilling = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP according to alterations in sodium removal and you can potassium excretion assortment from inside the salt delicate (letter = 186) and you can salt unwilling (letter = 222) somebody in the examination on the typical diet, thinking revealed given that mean ± SD. Investigation have been assessed from the around three-means ANOVA having pairwise testing followed by Tukey’s blog post hoc attempt https://datingranking.net/pl/hater-recenzja/.
Correlation of SBP thinking along side whole selection of urinary salt so you can potassium removal (Na + /K + ) ratio during the sodium delicate (letter = 71) and salt unwilling (letter = 119) individuals with slimming down intervention of Diet Solutions to Prevent Blood circulation pressure (DASH) (a) higher sodium (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 to own salt delicate = 0.04 and you will sodium resistant = 0.04) (b) reduced sodium (LS) eating plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for salt sensitive = 0.02 and sodium resistant = 0.00002).
