OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21 quizy bookofmatches.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Blog post Info
- ACM
- ACS
- APA
- ABNT
- Chicago
- Harvard
- IEEE
- MLA
- Turabian
People are permitted and motivated to post what they do on line (age.g., when you look at the institutional repositories or on their website) before and you may within the submission procedure, as is possible cause productive exchanges, in addition to before and deeper pass out of authored really works.
Recommendations
Globe Fitness Business. Being obese and you will over weight 2016. Federal Institute out of All forms of diabetes and Digestion and you may Kidney Sickness. Overweight and you can being obese statistics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Past Bmi: the value of way more perfect tips away from fatness and you may being obese during the societal research research. J Wellness Econ 2008;27(2):519-29. DOI: /j. Crowther Nj, Norris SA. The present day hips width cut part used for the newest prognosis of metabolic syndrome inside sandwich-Saharan African female is not suitable. PLoS That 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /diary. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva Roentgen. System picture pleasure certainly one of females people. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng Meters, Fleming T, Robinson Yards, Thomson B, Graetz Letter, Margono C, mais aussi al. Globally, local, and federal incidence regarding heavy and you can carrying excess fat in children and grownups during the 1980-2013: a logical research towards the Global Load regarding State Data 2013.
The fresh new Lancet 2014 Could possibly get 30;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan Am, Tergas AI, Satin AJ, Fader An. Being obese government for the gynecologic cancer tumors survivors: supplier methods and you may attitudes. Was J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fische EB. Environmental different types of fitness decisions. During the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Fitness Behavior and Health Training: Theory, Lookup, and practice. JOSSEY-Trout, a great wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, Bay area, Us. Bandura A beneficial. A social intellectual theory away from identity. During the Pervin L, John O, writers. Handbook of identity. Guilford Books, New york, Usa. Sarwer DB, Lavery M, Spitzer JC. A peek at brand new relationships ranging from significant obesity, well being, and you may sexual mode. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /sstep onestep 1695-0step one2-0588-step 1. Paeratakul S, Light MA, Williamson Weil, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and you will Bmi in terms of notice?impression regarding heavy. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff La, Karney BR. Beyond initial interest: real elegance into the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates Good, Whiteley Roentgen. Close relationship, medical and you will sandwich-clinical restaurants issues: A review of the new literary works. Gender Relatives Ther 20. Stokes R. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies understood looks picture relationships which have personal contentment. J Girls Ageing 2003;15(1):17-29. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Relationship anywhere between Bmi, Human body Image Frustration and you may Psychological Stress among Gymnasium Females Users when you look at the Zarqa-Jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Physique questionnaire: Derivation away from shortened “alternative versions”. Int J Eat Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:step 3 3. CO;2-step 3. Secrets A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura Letter, Taylor HL.
Indices off relative lbs and you can obesity. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A common measure of relationships fulfillment. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:29. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Human body picture dissatisfaction, weight reputation and exercise one of a sample from college students in the Saudi Arabia. Dinner Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-25. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Confident wellness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Dollars TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, High definition, Posavac SS. Women’s connection with narrow-and-beautiful media pictures: Human anatomy picture aftereffects of media-top internalization and you will impact-protection treatments. Human anatomy Visualize 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman Roentgen. Fulfillment off Earliest Emotional Means, Self-Calculated Get it done Inspiration, and you can Psychological Well-In Mothers Exercise in group-Centered As opposed to Individual-Centered Contexts. Healthcare Women Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Huntsman JA.
Obesity discrimination: the latest role out of looks, private ideology, and you may anti-body weight prejudice. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Give PG, Boersma H. And come up with sense of being lbs: A great hermeneutic investigation regarding adults’ reasons having obesity. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Sex differences in fitness-associated standard of living of intestinal obesity within the an excellent Korean populace. BMJ Unlock 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben We, Tight TA. The brand new impression out of looks visualize to your diligent worry. Prim Proper care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Muscles picture and you will marital fulfillment: research to your mediating character of sexual frequency and you may sexual satisfaction. J Fam Psychol 2011 April 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Seal BN, Meston CM. The association between sexual joy and body image in women.
J Gender Med 2010;7(2 Pt dos):905-16. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam E, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, mais aussi al. Communities, carrying excess fat, and all forms of diabetes–a good randomized personal try. N Eng J Med 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Has got the way forward for ination of sex, relationship, and you will emotional well-becoming. J Wellness Soc Behav 2014 May twelve;44(4):470-87.
