Logged problem beggining away from 2016. Adjudicator said reimburse most of the seven fund. Hopefully QQ pays aside punctually. QQ told you i experienced an equilibrium due out-of a lot of. Shared with FOS evidence that we paid down every currency. Final decision possess particularly thought to is money reduced to debt collecter within the calculation. In hopes i will be for the history challenge today 🙂
Effects just be advised easily the newest redress amount nonetheless it often date 7-21 days for fee, that is ironic once they can also be import a high interest loan for the fifteen minutes.
With got Casheuronet reject adjudicators choice back into Get rather than having read one thing I phoned FOS to enquire if my criticism was acquired because of the ombudsmen becoming told you to Casheuronet got made a deal regarding friendly payment. The idea is We would not discover nowadays one to it render resided if i hadn’t phoned. Whenever have been FOS provider probably inform me to enable me to take on. Bad situation scenario is if Casheuronet go-down the newest dish and these types of now offers was in fact sitting during the someone’s email to have days or published here days. Now I understand the FOS is actually under pressure and you may Casheuronet is a long way off out-of collapsing however, this is important to help you people with a good says. The newest FOS is actually a government looks which need to resist analysis, openness and you may liability
he has acknowledged specific. But refused much. And often they make a table offer. You happen to be proud of 6-21 state, but presumably would not be proud of thirteen-21.
As much as 17 loans try more than six decades once i 1st complained
I experienced an adjudication choice within the April one financing step three to 30 was reckless credit and must be paid back into complete. QQ declined of course and since waiting around for an Ombudsman in order to make the ultimate decision.
I talked so you’re able to FOS once again other big date in addition they actually have a deal from QQ having ?4k which is 1 / 2 of the quantity they are obligated to pay. I have refused but at least things are moving now. Hopefully they’re going to promote a better offer therefore we can also be personal this
CashEuronet (Small Quid) disagreed entirely with my adjudication glance at. Although not, brand new further discussions interact with tech concerns about the entitlement so you’re able to refuse new adjudication have a look at. Up to this problem was solved, your circumstances and some similar someone else will stay ‘for the hold’. I’m able to change your whenever you will find any improvements.
Hey all, FOS provides ruled within my rather have to own financing 5 – 21, QQ keeps up until 30th perhaps not carrying my personal breath with this particular one to and was expecting it are some other step three day waiting once the I am forecasting this will check out ombudsman
I’m in identical condition QQ responding with the tech items back in May and you may I am nevertheless waiting. Frequently they won’t end up being taken to the new ombudsman up until these talks was fixed.
Hi Zoe what I am unable to discover is what could be the tech items? and why QQ pay specific and never anyone else it is hard it’s not being shifted for an individual to consider one method or another.
you can inquire FOS what QQ’s tech arguments is. If you do not know, it’s hard to imagine as to the reasons their case are affected by her or him while some appear to commonly.
Hey Sara the I have already been told by the new adjudicator try his decision has never altered additionally the choice is drawn within a high stage although not the Obudsman phase. Why should it perhaps not move to you to definitely stage anyhow in the event that QQ dint concur with the Adjudicator anyway.
