Good. The relationship anywhere between recombination volume and genetic point into the eukaryotes

Good. The relationship anywhere between recombination volume and genetic point into the eukaryotes

Jevons, Yards. P., and you may Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Roadway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Live, I., and you can Nichols, An excellent. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Meters. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you will Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). step 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A great., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you can Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). Within the “The latest Scientific Basis out-of Drug Yearly Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School regarding London area, New Athlone Force, London area. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, Good. J. H., and you will Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The new parasexual duration and its own include in hereditary research

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Yards., and Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and you will Asheshov, Elizabeth. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and you may Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, A. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.step 3. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Highway. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Highway. Buc

Tarr, H. A great. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. An excellent. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Age. O., and you may Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Age. O., and Rippon, J. E. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. E., and you may Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.

Hereditary Investigation when you look at the Small-organisms DAVID An excellent. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Inclusion . eleven. Segregation due to the fact Proof Easy Hereditary Manage . A. Brand new hereditary method to biology . B. The fresh new identification off segregation . 111. The foundation off Hereditary Mapping . B. The sequencing out of loci on a beneficial linkage chart: multi-basis crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary fine-design . E. Deletion mapping . IV. Practical Genetic Screening . A good. Dominance examination . Bplementation evaluating . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Analysis in Eukaryotic Microorganisms . Good. General considerations . step 1. 2. Tetrad research . B. Genetic research in particular bacteria step one. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger or any other “imperfect” fungus 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Investigation inside the Prokaryotes . Good. Standard factors . step 1. Fertility items and you may conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you will co-transduction . step 3. Transformation and co-sales 4. Non-choosy studies .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Watson, W

Hereditary research in particular bacteria 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other Enteric micro-organisms . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Most other bacteria C. Official mapping methods separate of recombination VII. Genetic Investigation from inside the Viruses A great. General considerations . step 1. Variety of widespread genomes 2. Features out-of trojan family genes B. Hereditary research particularly viruses step one. Bacteriophages 2. Animal worms 3. Bush viruses VIII. Finishing Remarks References .

Recommended Posts