To your odds of kissing on address, there was a serious communication ranging from grandiose narcissism and you will participant sex, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. Which interaction was demonstrated when you look at the Fig 2. The straightforward slopes for males (simple slope = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you will girls (easy hill = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) weren’t tall. Grandiose narcissists did not express a greater probability of making out with an attached address more than just a single one (? = .068, t = step one.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not of the mate poaching getting a short-identity affair.
Grandiose narcissists commonly report partner poaching -particularly for the brand new brief-identity . Yet not, a question remains concerning if they find people in dating a whole lot more really worth searching for than people that are solitary. Widman and you will McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic tendencies might possibly be activated all over facts typically (including the self-declaration of life prevalence off intimate behavior), however become activated whenever listed in a particular condition. For this reason, it’s possible that grandiose narcissists reveal a track record of interesting during the partner poaching, but never necessarily see those in relationships is most readily useful mates. I checked-out which chance in the five studies.
Lover poaching collection.
For very long-label lover poaching, grandiose narcissism is actually a life threatening predictor for women (? = .306, t = dos.623, p = .010) and a marginally significant predictor for males (? = .218, t = step 1.725, p = .088). Not one of one’s Large Five parameters was basically extreme. Grandiose narcissism was not a significant predictor out of achievements within poaching to the a lot of time-identity for men (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), but it is for ladies (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). Not one of one’s additional factors was in fact tall apart from women’s neuroticism; when ladies was even more neurotic, it stated even more victory within poaching for a long-term intimate relationships.
Show
Of great interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t with the spouse poaching one of males. That it result is in keeping with abilities said of the Kardum and you may associates . Thus, you are able one grandiose narcissistic women can be more often accountable regarding companion poaching.
Content and you may process
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.
