Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A beneficial., & Rumiati, R. We. (2021). This new sum away from personality and you will cleverness towards the cognitive competences inside the highest studies. Frontiers inside the Therapy, twelve, 2566.
Damian, Roentgen. We., Spengler, Yards., Sutu, A great., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen happening sixty-six: An effective longitudinal examination of personality balances and alter around the half a century. Diary regarding Identity and you can Personal Psychology, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, A good. Yards., & Taylor, J. (2022). An investigation of the triarchic brand of psychopathy and you may thinking-claimed Team B identity diseases faculties. Personality Conditions: Theory, Lookup, and you may Cures, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, A great., & Monsen, J. (2009). Character traits and you can cleverness expect instructional college levels. Discovering and you will individual variations, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Forecasting instructional and you will public–mental consequences within the emerging adulthood out-of intelligence, personality, and socioeconomic reputation. Record off Personality and you can Social Mindset.
The netherlands, A great. S., & Roisman, G. We. (2008). Huge Five character traits and you will relationships high quality: Self-stated, observational, and physiological proof. Record of Social and private Matchmaking, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Meters. (2006). The relationship anywhere between intelligence and divorce. Record out of Loved ones Facts, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology from Team-B Personality Problems about Five-Foundation Model Direction. Chinese Psychological state Log.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). School knowledge and you may low-cognitive skill development. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The fresh impact out of parents’ and you will spouses’ studies into the split up pricing during the Norway. Group research, ten, 121-142.
Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. Yards., Haugen, P. M., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Reviews of physical attractiveness because a function of years. New Diary regarding Societal Mindset, 125(2), 157-168.
Companion really worth may refuse (or perhaps not), although it does not appear to be a barrier so you can relationships development
McGue, Meters., Anderson, Elizabeth. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, A good., Iacono, W. G., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not by grams alone: The many benefits of a college degree among people with low levels away from general cognitive function. Cleverness, ninety five, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Yards. D., Carter, Yards. S. kissbrides.com essayez ceci, & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Try social some body way more stunning? A no-associate data out-of agreeableness, extraversion, and elegance. Log out of Browse during the Identity, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). New telecommunications ranging from university poverty and you may agreeableness inside predicting academic attainment. Identification and you will Personal Differences, 127, 85-88.
Standard characteristics of identification and you will affectivity because the predictors out-of fulfillment during the intimate relationships: Research from care about?and you will mate?product reviews
Tatarunaite, E., Playle, R., Hood, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Facial elegance: a great longitudinal research. Western Diary regarding Orthodontics and you may Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flooding, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Integrated Personal Use Microdata Series, Newest Populace Questionnaire: Variation 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. Yards., Allen, E. S., & ). Reasons for having breakup and you can memories out-of premarital input: Ramifications having improving matchmaking knowledge. Few and you can Family members Mindset: Lookup and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). So why do character traits expect divorce proceedings? Multiple routes thanks to fulfillment. Log regarding Identification and you may Societal Therapy, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. A beneficial., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioral hereditary studies of your Black Triad in addition to Huge 5. Identification and you can individual Distinctions, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. An excellent., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, Meters., Clark, L. Good., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, Roentgen., … & Wright, An effective. G. (2019). Identification for the an effective hierarchical make of psychopathology. Logical Emotional Research, 7(1), 77-92.
The modern CPS research don’t show if the threat of divorce are additive. Connections you’ll indicate blended marriages has higher otherwise straight down dangers than the whole dangers of two some one. However, previous research on divorce or separation and you can studies shows that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The fresh new divorce proceedings risk for a couple of PhD holders means fifteen%, consistent with the individual risk of 7-8% having private PhD people.
Buss, D. Yards., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Ray, D. (2017). The latest mate modifying hypothesis. Character and Personal Distinctions, 104, 143-149.
